Section colegio de Cinaloa, y Sus missiones (pp. 516-22). Number of baptisms. Fight against witchcraft, the demon. Need for missions among haybinos (Abinos), hures (Ures) because otherwise they had to pass thru land of Nebomes, their enemies, to reach priests. Number of Christian marriages. Appears to be pattern sporadic warfare among Opata, Lower Pima groups. Section padre villalta (pp. 493-98) notes death, missionary work among Yaquis, Cinaloas, Zoes, Mayos, Nebomes. (T. Sheridan) (1976)

Detailed report on the establishment of the missions of Santa Ana and San Francisco Xavier in the Conchos and Chinarras territory. Antonio Arias, visits. Remarks on entradas, conversion efforts, present conditions including agriculture. Some Indian testimony. Other testimony confirms report. Includes inventory of crops. Remarks on relations between reduced and wild Indians. (J. Grusin) (1976)

Report on a general visit, concerned with the relocation of presidios and the loyalty of Indians. Contains ethnographic information on Seris and Guaymas. Much organizational organizational information (alliances, enemy relationships among Indians). Also attacks by Seri bands and Apaches. Geographical, climatic, demographic and faunal descriptions. (R. Perez) (1977)

Report by captain Joseph Barrotheran of Indian attacks by alliance of Pima and Apaches and lack of community support during campaign. Document in support of retaining Chihuhua presidios. (R. Davis) (1979)

Describes sad state Ostimuri due to rebellion Yaquis, Mayos, Pimas, Guaimas (Seri group). Notes abandonment mines. San Francisco Asis, Rio Chico, Baroyeca, Desiertos. Pleads for help from Nueva Vizcaya. (T. Sheridan) (1976)

Requests 50 or more soldiers from Nueva Vizcaya. States frontier Sonoran forces fighting Apaches, unable to help suppress Indian uprising involving Yaquis, Mayos, Pimas, Guaymas (Seri group), threatening to spread to Tepahues, Macoyaguis, Indians Rios Fuerte, Sinaloa. Describes 5/31 attack on Huidobro himself in Valle de Cedros. States Indians attempting to cut off access to south, Nuevo Vizcaya, using spies to monitor Spanish forces. Describes available Sinaloan forces as too poor to be effective, lacking necessary arms. Asks again for Tarahumara auxiliaries. (T. Sheridan) (1976)

Discusses moving the mission Nombre de Jesus. Suspicious activity among the Pampoas and Pausanes. Discusses the surveying of Candela and Santiago. Indicates the need for another presidio to deal with the Gavilanes and Tripas Blancas. Followed by the auditor's response to these issues. (R. Perez) (1977)

Mentions problem areas encountered in his visita general- describes the range of enemy Apaches and Tobosos. Mentions conflict between mission Indians and inhabitants of San Antonio. Some figures on troop size are present. (R. Perez) (1977)

Purpose of expedition was to determine extent of enemy-held territory. Notes that Apaches control all land between Viscaya and Coahuila. Also, discusses water resources. Observes that the Pacuachos were at war with the Sibolos. (R. Perez) (1977)

Testimony on revolt of Tarahumara and Pima Indians in Sinaloa and Sonora, including remarks on conditions and the uprising, as well as on mission activity. Remarks on Indian alliances. (J. Grusin) (1976)